Connection: You mentioned that you still play against the pet to locate and design. So how do you go to balance them? Is more powerful some of the rare pets? Or is this entirely depends on the player's operation?

Allen: This is entirely controlled by the players decide. You can see a pet, said: "Hey, I want only pet," then the only kind of pet may be extremely rare, there are three or four varieties of skills. Other pets will also have similar or different types of skills. So when we play against each other with a more exciting, more simple, more direct way, "I now have a world-rare pets, and I more strong." This is what we plan to achieve results.

Connection: Are you worried about a massive brush your pet's phenomenon? It seems I can already see the Chinese people began to Farm those rare pets, because obviously their prices will be multiplied ... ...

Allen: a very special pet. They are more close to the heart. We have never found a large-scale phenomena such goods Farm. Your question is indeed a very interesting question. I never thought in this regard. We will pay close attention to those who fall pets, and players in the game exactly how to get them. Our goal is to present all existing pet into a new battle system. Of course, you will see the new pet. In other words, as a pet with the pet before the start of battle experience, no problem.

Very special pets, they are more close to the heart.

Connection: "Diablo III" and "Panda mystery" have Monk this career, you and the "Dark III" team had discussions it? Your name and whether the meeting studied the problem of professional attributes?

Allen: tell the truth, the two monks are completely independent of each other. Maybe we will discuss issues such as "Hey, we want this system to use the same name." This may cause some confusion, but this is very rare. Our team is very independent to each other. But this is not what we say and do not exchange their closed, but we will not Blizzard decided on the design committee meetings such as "Yes," World of Warcraft "monks to do this job." Diablo " have to do monks. this game to live that "such matters.

This also does not work. Each team decide what they want to do. If we encounter a naming dispute, we will say, "Hey, we need to change the name slightly to replace the living altogether." But this is really rare.

Connection: In the past, Blizzard has promised to release each year, said a piece of information. It now appears that this is impractical?

Allen: A long time ago someone published some public comments that if a piece of information each year will be very good. I also think it would be great. But today we do not do this. Most importantly, the focus of our efforts is to try to make our products become the (players) seems great (gaming) experience. Players in the game to get the most pleasure is our principles and beliefs. We are indeed making efforts to accelerate the speed of data sheet. This is beyond doubt. But we do not succeed in this regard. Each piece of information is time-consuming nearly two years. In fact, the "earth fission" than any other piece of information that we have spent more time. Therefore, the (production rate) is indeed in our efforts to want to improve, but so far we have not achieved better results.